Tale of two CPECs
Dr. Niaz Murtaza
Executive Director, INSPIRING Pakistan
A game changer that will make Pakistan an Asian Tiger is how the PML-N sells the CPEC. None of the Tigers rose simply by building corridors with economic giants. So, one must view such claims cautiously. Still, this is the biggest economic opportunity to come Pakistan’s way in decades. That this is happening under an elected regime and autocracies could never conjure similar feats underlines democracy’s long-term potential. The PML-N deserves kudos for creating this opportunity. But the critical question now is whether it can transform opportunities into reality. One feels compelled to raise some concerns, at the risk of being branded unpatriotic even though the aim is patriotic in flagging possible pitfalls affecting attainment.
Firstly, project details reveal that around $11 billion (25%) of the money is for port, road and railway linkages between Pakistan and China. But the vast majority of the money-nearly 75%- is for power plants which will not directly contribute to the economic corridor unless they feed industries whose outputs travel on the corridor. However, CPEC plans only contain vague references to establishing industrial parks. Thus, there is not one integrated CPEC but actually two unconnected CPECs presently: the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (25%) and China Pakistan Electricity Cooperation (75%). Unless PML-N integrates the two, the chances of Pakistan becoming an Asian Cub, nary a Tiger, will be remote, though the two unconnected CPECs will still benefit it individually.
The “China Pakistan Electricity Cooperation” contains 24 projects, as shown on the Planning Commission’s website, to be built by Chinese companies’ FDI with Pakistan obligated to buy their output at unknown rates. Thus, the first challenge will be avoiding the exorbitant rates Pakistan faced earlier with IPPs and weaker states often face with China. Given the serious logistical and technical problems with recent power plant construction in Pakistan, ensuring successful execution will be another major challenge. There are regional issues too. Of the total $35 billion investment in power projects, nearly $10 billion is for Sindh, $7 billion for Punjab, $ 8.5 billion for Balochistan, $2.5 billion for AJK, $1.8 billion for KP, $4.5 billion for projects involving Punjab and another province and zilch for GB, which ironically provides Pakistan actual access to China on the economic corridor. Thus, Balochistan is the only backward region with a high share. However, given past history, it will require special efforts to ensure that the employment and electricity generated by projects there benefit its residents equitably. Finally, environmental issues are also salient as the biggest chunk of the projects involves coal. Even if all these challenges are overcome, Pakistan will only regain the pre-2005 situation of adequate electricity when its economy was growing but without getting transformed into a Tiger.
The more strategic element is the actual China Pakistan Economic Corridor which, if handled properly, provides the potential to link Pakistan’s economy with China and beyond and result in its structural upgrading. This component covers investment of around $11 billion, including $10 billion loans by China to Pakistan at highly concessional 1.6% rate for roads and railway work, and around $1 billion grant for Gwadar port, airport and other projects. Even here, nearly $3.5 billion is for the upgrading of the Karachi-Peshawar railway tracks which cannot be immediately considered part of the economic corridor until it gets linked to China, which is only planned by 2030. Thus, only around $7 billion or around 15% of the $46 billion will actually go immediately towards building the real CPEC!
However, even here, besides the Gwadar work, the Commission website only mentions the Raikot-Islamabad and Multan-Sukkur motorways but not the western route or even a link from Sukkur to Gwadar. Even if a complete Gwadar-Khunjerab motorway gets built, it will mainly yield transit fees on Chinese traffic like on NATO convoys and income for the hotels, workshops and brothels which invariably emerge on major trucking routes. It is yet unknown how much transit fees Pakistan will charge and earn annually. Nor is there any study about the likely impact of motorways construction on broader local economies along their routes.
Accruing higher returns from the CPEC will require strategic thinking and projects to link Pakistan’s industrial output with China’s markets as it transits to a consumption-led economy facing labor shortages. The Commission has the economic, social and political experts to develop ideas, feasibility plans and technical reports for such strategic projects which also ensure equity and sustainability. Unfortunately, its website till now reflects little such use of these capacities, containing only a skeletal list of projects and a few maps. Until such strategic thinking emerges, even Nawaz Sharif’s less ambitious plans to link Kashghar with Gwadar will remain dreams like Iqbal’s desires to link Kashghar with the Nile’s banks.
The writer is a political and development economist with INSPIRE Pakistan (Initiative for Sustainable and Progressive Ideas to Redress Equity in Pakistan). email@example.com
The Express Tribune > Pakistan > Sindh ‘Local government system virtually abolished in Sindh’ ‘Local government system virtually abolished in Sindh’ Speakers point out flaws in functioning of local bodies at launching ceremony of research study By News...
Islamabad-Advocating further political, administrative and financial devolution, experts on Wednesday pointed out several flaws in the Islamabad local government (LG) system. A review report launched by INSPIRING Pakistan and Pattan Development Organisation, Islamabad called for legislative...